Jump to content

2025/26 Ins & Outs Discussion


David
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, wellsince75 said:

Quite liked Wimmer outlining that he'll only bring in better players than the ones we've got. Very sensible. 

Only issue is he's happy with a lot of the player we have.  Not as sensible. 

Overall signing c4 quality players in the transfer window also sounds sensible. 

I think he'll sign more than 4 players, although it won't be a complete overhaul. If the squad, as is, can't play his intense high prerssing game, he'll bring in a few new faces to enable that change in style.  Also, he won't want to upset current squad members as we still have 4 competitive fixtures to fulfil.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree with the people that are against loan signings. We have had some good ones over years. Ruddy. Juitkewics, Biereth. All made big contribution to league position. Youth set up at present would not provide anywhere near that talent. Also other spl clubs taking advantage of having quality players that they couldn't normally afford. Owen Beck at Dundee. Dalby at utd. I got one would take either on loan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, robsterwood said:

Disagree with the people that are against loan signings. We have had some good ones over years. Ruddy. Juitkewics, Biereth. All made big contribution to league position. Youth set up at present would not provide anywhere near that talent. Also other spl clubs taking advantage of having quality players that they couldn't normally afford. Owen Beck at Dundee. Dalby at utd. I got one would take either on loan. 

I don't think anyone is against signing two or three quality players on a Loan basis. Like Beck and Dalby. The issue is making dozens of Loan signings who contribute zero, and in some cases feature for a few minutes at best before disappearing off the face of the earth. Of this season's batch, who do you think has been a success? Perhaps more to the point, who has failed to deliver?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, robsterwood said:

Disagree with the people that are against loan signings. We have had some good ones over years. Ruddy. Juitkewics, Biereth. All made big contribution to league position. Youth set up at present would not provide anywhere near that talent. Also other spl clubs taking advantage of having quality players that they couldn't normally afford. Owen Beck at Dundee. Dalby at utd. I got one would take either on loan. 

Yip, the issue isn't the loan signing....it's the quality of the signing.  Furlong, Gent, lukas oh wowwwww, ruddy,  biereth all great.    Loans only highlighted when we sign bad ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, dennyc said:

I don't think anyone is against signing two or three quality players on a Loan basis. Like Beck and Dalby. The issue is making dozens of Loan signings who contribute zero, and in some cases feature for a few minutes at best before disappearing off the face of the earth. Of this season's batch, who do you think has been a success? Perhaps more to the point, who has failed to deliver?  

Andrews been decent.....that's about it though Armstrong attitude and workrate can't be faulted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weeyin said:

Kaleta was good until we crocked him.

He started well in an attacking sense. But was rotten after that. Not selected even when fit. Possibly because defensively he was a liability and he lost the ability to cross a ball. Seemed to get better the less he played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of our 10 loanees only maybe 5 have been in any way useful.

Taveres, Dickson, Plange  - been completely pointless signings

Vale - Was good last season but been injured majority of the season

Mair and Balcombe - served a purpose as Ox and then Mair got injured.

Watt, Armstrong, Andrews, Kaleta - all had a couple of decent performances but not been consistent.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thewelllfan said:

Of our 10 loanees only maybe 5 have been in any way useful.

Taveres, Dickson, Plange  - been completely pointless signings

Vale - Was good last season but been injured majority of the season

Mair and Balcombe - served a purpose as Ox and then Mair got injured.

Watt, Armstrong, Andrews, Kaleta - all had a couple of decent performances but not been consistent.

 

 

 

I forgot Watt was on loan.   Not done enough,  Saturday he was great but not seen enough of that.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, texanwellfan said:

I’ll be interested to see if we pull in any players from the European mainland through some of Wimmer’s contacts. 

I hope his German contacts are better than the ones McGhee had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, grizzlyg said:

I forgot Watt was on loan.   Not done enough,  Saturday he was great but not seen enough of that.  

Exactly!blows my mind reading I would give him another year or two one good game in about 19 games and it merits a contract.

No value in signing him whatsoever and not telling me we can't get our hands on a younger version that has the same attributes nah we have enough retained now the rest can leave let's just build around what we have and push on.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Spit_It_Out said:

Exactly!blows my mind reading I would give him another year or two one good game in about 19 games and it merits a contract.

No value in signing him whatsoever and not telling me we can't get out hands on a younger version that has the same attributes nah we have enough retained now the rest can leave let's just build around what we have now and push on.

Agreed,we've had as good out of watt as were ever going to get,there's no reason whatsoever to take him on permanently.theres no way we will be going with umpteen forwards again next season and with robinson and maswinise already signed up for next season the scope for making the required changes is already limited.we need to freshen it up and hope we can get someone in that can perform on a more regular basis than watt has this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Spit_It_Out said:

Exactly!blows my mind reading I would give him another year or two one good game in about 19 games and it merits a contract.

No value in signing him whatsoever and not telling me we can't get our hands on a younger version that has the same attributes nah we have enough retained now the rest can leave let's just build around what we have and push on.

Tony Watt or Zak Robinson i know who I'd rather have in the team and it's not Robinson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Us fans will always get excited with new signings over keeping known quantities, despite the fact that we could end up signing the Austrian Harry Paton or German Tony Watt. We need squad players, and those two are just that, and ideally we can have a couple of our young players supplement the squad rather than bringing in the likes of Davor and Moses.

I'm fine with keeping a core of players from this season for continuity, and also manage the risk of brining in too many unknown quantities. There's no player outside of Miller that I'd care about losing, but none that I'd be furious about keeping either.

I doubt we will mutual any injured player, unless we're generous with the payoff.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, fizoxy said:

Us fans will always get excited with new signings over keeping known quantities, despite the fact that we could end up signing the Austrian Harry Paton or German Tony Watt. We need squad players, and those two are just that, and ideally we can have a couple of our young players supplement the squad rather than bringing in the likes of Davor and Moses.

I'm fine with keeping a core of players from this season for continuity, and also manage the risk of brining in too many unknown quantities. There's no player outside of Miller that I'd care about losing, but none that I'd be furious about keeping either.

I doubt we will mutual any injured player, unless we're generous with the payoff.

Id be quite happy to see both kept on. Keep seeing comments on social media to the effect of there's going to be a complete clear out at the end of the season - that won't be happening 

According to someone on Facebook tonight Aston is rubbish and Carson is miles better. I like Carson but sometimes I don't know what it is fans want or expect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, wellgirl said:

Id be quite happy to see both kept on. Keep seeing comments on social media to the effect of there's going to be a complete clear out at the end of the season - that won't be happening 

According to someone on Facebook tonight Aston is rubbish and Carson is miles better. I like Carson but sometimes I don't know what it is fans want or expect. 

I don't think anyone would argue that Carson is a better keeper. But ox is not too bad either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...