Jump to content

2025/26 Ins & Outs Discussion


David
 Share

Recommended Posts

We may be running the risk of being seen as or data pointing towards us being a club that developes bigger clubs young players saving them the bother and getting nowt out of it at the end of the loan.

Ending up with a lot of young loanees, learning their trade. With us having to change the team every year when they go back ,  in the long run doesn't really help us much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turnbull is a definite no go, I think he’ll be at Cardiff for another 2 years and see out his contract. Crazy money involved down there.

as for Rice, even if he does come and does well, he’d need removed any time we played Rangers, I just think it screws up team dynamics when we get a loanee from SPFL teams. Not just for those weeks he’s not allowed to play but a week or so after it when he gets back in the team. 

If we could sign him permanently great, I’d take him then but is he the type to take a drop in pay To kick start his career? I’m not so sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mio said:

Turnbull is a definite no go, I think he’ll be at Cardiff for another 2 years and see out his contract. Crazy money involved down there.

as for Rice, even if he does come and does well, he’d need removed any time we played Rangers, I just think it screws up team dynamics when we get a loanee from SPFL teams. Not just for those weeks he’s not allowed to play but a week or so after it when he gets back in the team. 

If we could sign him permanently great, I’d take him then but is he the type to take a drop in pay To kick start his career? I’m not so sure.

I've heard that the Rice thing is unlikely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re Bailey Rice- if he was a youngster from England suspect we'll be pretty happy. Complimenting our squad with players better than we can afford works for us. 

The debate appears more around proximity to developing players from teams in the same league as ours. I can understand that agree with Mio's point re not being able to play against Rangers. 


We do need to bolster the midfiled options, if we have some young guns coming through then great, if not players I'm someone like Rice with similar potential to Miller can have positive outcomes for us both short and longer term. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, grizzlyg said:

Nothing against young Bailey but I would rather see us develop our own players and break them gently into first team.

I think we would all prefer that. Except that currently we do not have one young player that is good enough to step up. And no-one of the quality that Rice showed before his move to Ibrox. Scottish internationalist alongside Miller. And Captain I think. Despite his lack of first team games he has performed well at Rangers. In hindsight maybe he should have stayed with us though. And like Miller waited a few years before cashing in, 


As soon as we saw Miller and Turnbull given a first team outing it was obvious they were  a class above. Can you say that about any of the young players we have seen since? Youth development will continue in the background irrespective of whether we bring in loan players or not. The Miller fee will help in that respect but it will take time. Maybe the extra funding will enable us to poach quality from other Academies which should speed up the process and provide faster results. I hope so. 

The only down side with Rice would be him having to sit out any game against Rangers. He is out of contract in 2026 and if we got the opportunity to sign him outright…now or then…  I think we would crazy to pass up on the opportunity. Of course some fans will never get over the fact he opted to move to Rangers and would be on his back from day one. Such is life in Scotland where even revealing their backing for either of the OF brings out the worst in fans of their parent club. We are no exception. 

Bottom line. Any signing that improves the side is a good signing. Loan or not. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, robsterwood said:

Why develop a rival clubs player? Rather we got more proven talent out with spl pool 

Ultimately You're always developing a player for another club, e g Lennon Miller or a player has seemingly nothing else to give a club, cooper/ Russell 

If the lad has something to offer, get him in...we can't afford to turn our nose up at anyone who might improve us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wellon said:

Ultimately You're always developing a player for another club, e g Lennon Miller or a player has seemingly nothing else to give a club, cooper/ Russell 

If the lad has something to offer, get him in...we can't afford to turn our nose up at anyone who might improve us.

Except we got a return on Miller - we won't on Rice unless there's an option to buy him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wellsince75 said:

Most folks were happy we signed Biereth on loan, knowing we'd never make money from when his parent club cashed in. 

This is a different situation. It's a player who came through our ranks and who we could have made money from if he had stayed with us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wellfan said:

His parent club wasn’t a direct rival known as the rangers. 

My main gripe is that the central midfield is so important in this new set up and he’s going to miss games, it’s disruptive.
And has he really been good when he’s played for Rangers? The support I know havnt been that impressed? He did quite well in a European game and he started a cup game against a lower league side and he was hooked at half time? 
i’m not convinced with youngsters from rangers anyway, I think they are cursed with a “I’ve made it already” attitude. Lowry went out on loan and was rotten, the boy Devine wasn’t great. I just don’t think they get good habits at rangers. Similar to youngsters at Celtic. Maybe that’s why they have such an appalling record at bringing in youths 

Anyway, I doubt it’ll happen!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dennyc said:

Does it matter if it benefits us? Or does the fact it is one of the OF override everything? Because that is the way it reads on here. 

I'm not a fan of loans from any team in the same league unless we have a chance to sign them at the end of the deal.

As much as anything it puts unnecessary pressure (and scrutiny) on the loanee, who is open to accusations of not trying (or worse, cheating) when a poor result for us would benefit their parent club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dennyc said:

Does it matter if it benefits us? Or does the fact it is one of the OF override everything? Because that is the way it reads on here. 

Yes it matters, the ideal scenario is we take a player on loan develop and make him better, so we benefit and the parent club benefits as well, all win win so far.

The problem is bringing in, a player from teams in your own league  to develop and improve yes we benefit short term but if it has went to plan the player returns to the parent club a better player to one day turn up against us in the league or cup.

Making the rival teams in your league stronger in whatever form that takes is never a good plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...