Jump to content

In's And Out's


AndyRoss
 Share

Recommended Posts

i think that unless we change our formation a right back is needed urgently .

 

sutton can do a job if we get good crosses into the box but IMO we could do with a striker to because like we seen last year sutton has dry patches when he doesent score for a while

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmm, not sure if, given the finance, we'll see any more signings, possibly another 1.

 

we must have more money to spend on the playing squad.

 

we've took in around £1.7 million for porter, clarkson, quinn and mcghee

 

we've took in around £230,000 in europa league prize money.

 

the new tv deal gives us the same money in 2009/10 as the old setanta one would have.

 

the wage bill is much smaller with hughes, porter and malcolm alone freeing up 10 grand a week.

 

even including the cost of the pitch we have brought in a lot of money in 2009 and i therefore don't see why we would need to be running a much cheaper squad than we were in 2007/08.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From BBC Gossip Page:

Motherwell are to take a look at Australian full-back Simon Storey, who turned down a new contract with Partick Thistle. (Daily Express)

Reading about him, he's played both right back and left back in the past. We do know that Gannon likes his players to be versatile...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want quality you have to pay for it though. Had we not received money for McGhee/Leitch, Clarkson and Quinn then I wouldn't expect us to be paying any money for anyone.

 

I thought, perhaps naively, that at least a small percentage of the money received from the above mentioned would be used to pay at some least some small transfer fees, rather than the "hope we can get it for nothing" approach.

 

My point is, I don't think we can replace Porter and Clarksons goals without paying for them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want quality you have to pay for it though. Had we not received money for McGhee/Leitch, Clarkson and Quinn then I wouldn't expect us to be paying any money for anyone.

 

I thought, perhaps naively, that at least a small percentage of the money received from the above mentioned would be used to pay at some least some small transfer fees, rather than the "hope we can get it for nothing" approach.

 

My point is, I don't think we can replace Porter and Clarksons goals without paying for them

 

Indeed. It will be a costly mistake if we don't replace those goals. And if JG can;t identify one or even two Strikers to come in for nothing it will be one of Boyle's biggest follies to date for not giving him some money to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want quality you have to pay for it though. Had we not received money for McGhee/Leitch, Clarkson and Quinn then I wouldn't expect us to be paying any money for anyone.

 

I thought, perhaps naively, that at least a small percentage of the money received from the above mentioned would be used to pay at some least some small transfer fees, rather than the "hope we can get it for nothing" approach.

 

My point is, I don't think we can replace Porter and Clarksons goals without paying for them

We got Porter for nothing and Skippy. The thing is you don't know what's out there for nothing and Jim Gannon probably will. Money doesn't automatically mean goals. And even if a player signs for free there is a signing on fee involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did we not get Clarky, Porter, and McCormack for nothing though? Did they replace the goals we lost when McDonald and Faddy left? When was the last time we spent money on a striker?

 

Gow would have cost a lot more than the £200k transfer fee, would have no intention of coming here, and he's also shite.

 

I'm not worried. I'm sure the manager knows exactly what he needs and i wouldn't be surprised to see the transfer activity pick up after Thursday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i havent heard much about the trialists that were training with the the squad are they still there or has jim gannon got rid of them IMO there will be a few in before the end of the month and i think jg is just waiting until after the mora before he dips into the free transfer market -_-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gow would have cost a lot more than the £200k transfer fee, would have no intention of coming here, and he's also shite.

 

i) plymouth have had a bid accpeted for 200k accepted by rangers hence why i said that sum of money ii) why would he have no intention comng here? he would have to relocate to plymouth and get one back on the h**s iii) and dont think hes shite, at falkirk scored a few goals and set up many, would be quality playing behind sutton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...