FirParkCornerExile

I really want to see what the WS are offering.

** info means original post answered.

The Well Society have £750,000 and in 6 years time they can buy back for £650,000, so can they not take back control at that point. Apologies I've not looked in detail yet.

I'm sorry but raffles, tombola's and WS quiz nights don't do it for me as our fund raising opportunities. If they have something thats better I'll happily reject. If they dont I'll consider the investment offer. As long as the assets of the club are protected (ie, the ground) I'm open to be convinced.

That's my big bug bear , surely to recommend rejection the Well society should have a detailed counter 6 year vision.

thats exactly it , hes no better than the day he arrived and could never show any consistency.

oh man I hope so....lol

Bevis was always a fuck up waiting to happen. Contrary to reports we didn't offer him a contract which restores some of my faith in our recruitment.

Fees are scheduled to be paid by dates , so not necessary to have the money in the bank at the time the transaction is agreed. St Pauli apparently interested in Bair

the fee being quoted , admittedly on pie and bovril, is £100,000 if we've paid that one of the two I mentioned is offski.

If we've paid a fee for him and agreed one St Mirren couldnt I suspect either Bair or Miller are off or both. We cant normally afford any fees.

I could be persuaded, if not totally convinced, to keep some Id rather see gone but Mugabi just isnt one of them.

SOD is not our worst player by any means , but if Mugabi resigns I will feel like giving up.

I know others will disagree but I think he flatters to deceive and spends more time on his arse than anything else. Before he got injured he wasnt even nuisance value.

I don't know why people are upset. He was well down the pecking order of absolute dross last season. Think he will do OK for us.

I don't propose to write copious amounts about it here but there is plenty online about contact extensions and timelines and trigger points. The club certainly does have the ability to opt out of the extension however there are certain triggers and timelines they must adhere to after which the contact extends and the club wouldnt have such scope.

My very point from the start. if the coaching budget had seen a reduction i dont have an issue. I would if the coaching budget was being increased to create a position for him.

options are a two way agreement. Just because there was an option it doesnt the player has the final decision its a two way agreement.

I cant believe you cant see this. If we had budgeted for Obika for another year that a wage is from the playing budget. If we then decide to pay him as a coach we still have the same outgoings if no one has left the coaching staff. We have merely reduced the playing budget and increased the coaching budget. We could have called it quits not taken the one year option and we could have let him go and kept his wage in the playing budget.

Whether he had another option of a player is immaterial if we've swapped his playing wage for a coaching wage and no one has come of the coaching staff we've in essence wasted a wage that could have gone to the playing budget.

I wouldnt be expecting the playing budget to be sacrificed for a back room wage if a backroom member of staff hasnt left, that's my very point.

For a club thats always pleading poverty we create some amount of backroom jobs, if someone left fair enough but if not the money cold have be better spent.

Makes a change from being usurped by St Mirren.

Dont know if its unpopular but have to say I hate the white shorts

well that would be my expectation, the WS say they have plans so lets see them .