texanwellfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago Would like to see the Fadinger PK claim from VAR angles. At the time I thought it was a PK but haven’t seen it back to tell if it was or not. Purely just for my own interest, it’s done and over now so just want to see if ref/VAR made right call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orinoco Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago It was Ibrox, no danger we get a penalty when it matters. The authorities will do anything to drag The Rangers back into a title race. They need the prize money to stop them going bust. Just like how often they get home cup games. There is only so many share issue investments they can do. Financial fair play does not apply in scotland. Also note they are in deflecting overdrive mode with their disallowed goal should have stood. No statements issued about the officials when they win, especially when it goes for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago Clear penalty for Fadinger ignored by the ref and VAR. That is cheating, plain and simple. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orinoco Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago Yip clip on other website shows clear contact and foul. Pathetic, but as i said no suprise. Easy to apologise to the smaller clubs than run the rath of the bigot fans. To think people thought with VAR introduction this cheating would stop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsince75 Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago Had it been the other way I suspect a much longer VAR review would have happened . i don’t blame the ref tbh , he had a good view and can see why he may not give it. But you’d expect a longer review from VAR which is poor , yet typical against OF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orinoco Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago I do blame the referee. He was up with play with good view of incident. He bottled it. He could have given it and asked to confirm it or overturn it, ie give him the chance to review it again on tv. By ignoring it he passes the buck. As someone else said The Rangers players reactions said it all. They thought it was a penalty. The referee surely sees this big clue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago Fadinger penalty claim was 100% stonewaller. Why no VAR review? A serious question for the SFA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0Neils40yarder Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 100% there was contact...the only thing the photograph doesn't determine is who kicked who Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie Posted 48 minutes ago Report Share Posted 48 minutes ago A soft penalty is still a penalty, same as a soft free kick is still a free kick. Wasn’t much in the game at all. They took their chance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mio Posted 3 minutes ago Report Share Posted 3 minutes ago The clips I’ve now seen confirm to me it’s a clear penalty. I cannot believe VAR never looked at it. just need to brush ourselves down and use it as motivation on Tuesday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.