New Kit

[SteelmaninOZ]

6 minutes ago, grizzlyg said:

Some folk will hate the shorts while others will think they are grrrrrrrrreeeeaaaaaatttttttttt! 🤪

Oh dear 

[weeyin]

1 hour ago, numpty said:

Don't usually have much of an opinion on our shirts as I'm never going to be buying another one anyway, but all the sleeve logos make this one of the ugliest ones I can remember. 

Certainly not in the Adidas 3 stripes category.

Tom Sparrow won't be happy either. Last season he said he hated collars like that.

[Yoshi-1991]

That tiger logo looks like it was made on chatgpt

[santheman]

If we're getting money they can put whatever the **** they like on it as far as Im concerned Ill still buy it.

£65 compared to £110 for a Rangers top I'll take that any day.

[Big Stall]

Not as good as last season 😢

[weeyin]

If I didn't already know I was too old to be wearing the new shirt, the music on the release video would have reminded me.

I'm off to have a lie down and listen to some Jesus and Mary Chain.

[Ya Bezzer!]

6 minutes ago, weeyin said:

If I didn't already know I was too old to be wearing the new shirt, the music on the release video would have reminded me.

I'm off to have a lie down and listen to some Jesus and Mary Chain.

I don't think the kids today could cope with Upside Down.

'What's that awful noise?' 'Scruffy hooligans' 'No tune'. etc.

[Great Balls of Shire]

1 hour ago, grizzlyg said:

I rarely agree with you but yup I don't like the white shorts, should be claret 

Amber shorts can be nice too

[texanwellfan]

It’s a bit busy and messy for me but I’m more concerned about how we play rather than how we look so, on we go. COYW!!!

[grizzlyg]

1 hour ago, Great Balls of Shire said:

Amber shorts can be nice too

Hmmmm not for me bud, I am maybe boring but always like them to be claret 

[Spiderpig]

1 hour ago, Great Balls of Shire said:

Amber shorts can be nice too

All depends on who's wearing them 

[MJC]

The jersey is quite similar to the 2009/10 Canterbury effort especially with the badge and the manufacturer logo in the centre. That kit had amber shorts mind you.

[joewarkfanclub]

Without all the sponsors on it the shirt wouldnt look too bad. I quite like the white Macron down the sleeves. A hark back to the old Scotland Umbro kits.

However, the shorts/socks combo doesnt work for me.

I also prefer claret shorts. But if we are going for white, the socks needed to be claret.

All that said, Im also not the demographic its aimed at so it will probably go down a storm with the weans!

[Gadgey]

2 hours ago, MJC said:

The jersey is quite similar to the 2009/10 Canterbury effort especially with the badge and the manufacturer logo in the centre. That kit had amber shorts mind you.

For me, it’s far more like the Matchwinner shirt of 1987-89 but with loads of stuff stuck on it

[Pettywulliegrew-2]

It’s got a hoop and white shorts 💝

[MJC]

26 minutes ago, Gadgey said:

For me, it’s far more like the Matchwinner shirt of 1987-89 but with loads of stuff stuck on it

Just before my time that one but yes it’s similar too.

[David]

It's one of those shirts that will likely look pretty good as part of a whole kit, worn by footballers on a football pitch, but maybe not so much worn by the average Scottish guy with jeans and a pair of trainers. 

I'll likely wait and see what the training collection looks like this year.

[Lobey_Dosser]

As someone who doesn’t mind a centralised badge and prefers white shorts, this strip should be my cup of tea. Sadly, there’s too much going on with it. I’m very surprised we didn’t go with a cleaner looking home kit after last year’s muddle.

Talking of surprises, how have we ended up with lucky tiger? Even if due diligence has been upped after recent experiences, surely we have the financial security and morals to limit sponsorship to organisations that are aligned to our community and family values?  

[wellsince75]

3 hours ago, Gadgey said:

For me, it’s far more like the Matchwinner shirt of 1987-89 but with loads of stuff stuck on it

very similar to the '87 strip.  Just shows how diluted the amber has become over the years.  Some similarities to the 09 top. 

The home strip often is a bit disappointing. aointing. 

[Spiderpig]

37 minutes ago, Lobey_Dosser said:

 

Talking of surprises, how have we ended up with lucky tiger? Even if due diligence has been upped after recent experiences, surely we have the financial security and morals to limit sponsorship to organisations that are aligned to our community and family values?  

Financial security is a bold statement to make in the context of a football club, they are not allowed to advertise Alcohol or Tobacco etc but gambling is fair game, put a print of a tiger on your shorts for a no doubt 6 figure wedge of cash is a no brainer for the club, free money.

 

[Mccus28]

I personally dont like the new kit but I don't buy them so im pretty sure Motherwell don't care 🤣

[Kmcalpin]

1 hour ago, Lobey_Dosser said:

Talking of surprises, how have we ended up with lucky tiger? Even if due diligence has been upped after recent experiences, surely we have the financial security and morals to limit sponsorship to organisations that are aligned to our community and family values?  

Within reason, it doesn't matter to me who our sponsors are. If we are going to apply moral criteria, where do we draw the line? What is acceptable to one fan might be completely unacceptable to another. If we are going to start applying moral criteria when seeking sponsors, we might be fishing in a very small pond.

As for Lucky Tiger, I know nothing about them whatsoever.