Jump to content

In's And Out's


AndyRoss
 Share

Recommended Posts

Has there been any news on whether the Gannon will be allowed to spend any of the capital we have brought in of late, or will it be frees and loans only for us?

 

Believe the official position is that there is a budget that can be used to bring players in.

 

Whether the budget is used on small fees, signing on bonuses, wages or all of the above is up to the manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Given their age and health, I don't think Webster and Kennedy fit the Gannon model - and quite right too. Both players were quality - but too big a gamble now.

 

By all means dig up this post six months on if Webster pops up for a corner and headers in a late winner for the Bairns tho.

 

Players will come in to Fir Park over next few weeks. Like Jennings, most of us will never have heard of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In todays Evening Times that we are challenging the Dons for Stepover on loan a year. The Jim Paterson versus Stevie Hammell East Stand touchline challenge starts here....

 

(Wee Stevie would win but would obviously cut inside in doing so :P )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could do a lot worse that get Steven MacLean on loan as well. Has a good record in the lower leagues in England and the added bonus is that it may well p*ss off MM who is apparently trying to sign him on loan for the sheep scarers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said this before, but the type of football we played with patty at left back was far far better than the football played with Hammy.

 

With hammy everytime the ball is at left back its a case of head down and chip the ball over the right backs head into the channel, whereas with patty it was a bit more adventurous. Both are class players, i just prefer Patty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be delighted if we got JP back.

 

I had felt Hammell had gone stale for about a season before he left us, and while I was happy to get him back when we lost JP I still don't think that he has been anything other than average in a season and a half. He still drifts out of position too often and for a defender I think his defensive qualities are poor. Whereas JP had, in my opinion, been our best player that season before leaving.

 

If he returned at least as good as the player we lost then that would be a tremendous signing.

 

Stuart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we definitely need to exercise a bit of caution on this. if paterson has barely played for the year or so there's a fair chance he'll be a little bit mumford. get him on the scales before we sign him.

 

if he is in decent shape i say bring him back. i'd stick with hammell at fullback and play jim in midfield. if we're actually going to play this daft 4-2-3-1 formation he could be handy in the left of the 3, his best performances before he dropped back into defence were playing on the left hand side in an attacking 4-5-1.

 

but definitely get him weighed first. he ripped the piss out of us by being out of shape for three years then suddenly managed to get fit when mcghee started cracking the whip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...