weeyin

We have Sparrow and Halliday, in the short term at least, but I know what you mean. To get us to the next window, I'd lean towards 2 strikers and one defender unless Ross shows he is good enough.

So if we were to sign 3 new players, would you go for two strikers and one defender, two defenders and one striker or some other combination? Bonus question. If you knew Sule would return in October, would you choose differently?

Davidson is certainly in the mix for me. Davidson, Graham, Marinello and Pettigrew were all standouts from my early memories of the team.

Watt mentioned in his "official" interview last week that every club he has been with since he was at Wolves has tried to play this style, so he feels very comfortable with it. It certainly looks that way.

Could have been off the park for persistent fouling and his ankle breaker on Maswanhise, but somehow gets away with it.

After all the stick I have given the defence over the past couple of seasons I was tempted to give one of them the MOTM for a clean sheet, but difficult to look past Fadinger.

So far JBA seems to know what he's doing, so I'm confident the lack of cutting edge will be addressed.

Positives- clean sheet away from home, and 67% possession Negatives - we need more central striking options. Also positive - unbeaten start to the league after 2 tough fixtures.

So it turns out one way to "earn the right to play football" is to practice playing football during the preseason, practice it a bit more the week before a game, then use that practice immediately after kick-off to play football from the start of the game. Now take your pick...

Gogić getting away with an ankle breaker there. Not even a foul given.,

I have no doubt JBA will bring in a couple more strikers before the window closes. On the plus side, the early season has shown how well we can cope without Miller.

Also, kudos to the person who chose the half-time photo on the Twitter feed.

The "best midfield outside of Celtic" working hard to maintain their 30% possession in the first half. Still needing a striker or two though.

Is that the fault of our training methods too?

Biggest positive so far is we haven't been dragged down to their level. Still sticking to the plan.

All good here - maybe the unusual Paisley sunshine causing issues,

His name's Campbell, though.

Possibly, but his record post Fir Park, suggests he is a 4 or 5 goals per season striker at this level.

Balmer, like Casey, gave me the fear every time I saw him on the team sheet. It looks like SOD is being chosen ahead of him ecause he is more capable of passing a ball to a player in his own team - and that is the core of JBA's new philosophy. You could argue that lessens our aerial power in defending crosses, but I'd struggle to remember Balmer winning a battle in that department. What is obvious is that we need at least one, and probably two, central defenders who can play a bit of football.

The more we keep the ball, the less chances we'll concede (Cap'n Obvious, I know). As much as I have slated our defensive efforts the past few seasons, after we gifted the goal to Rangers last week, we actually restricted them to very few chances. I agree, however, we'll need to score a few, because this defence - even on its best day - is pretty much guaranteed to concede.

Did I miss the announcement this week, or was that also secret?

Yep. O'Neill is too, but I enjoyed his 40 yarder.

20 games, zero goals. Whatever the reasons, not our best ever signing

Gallacher, Scott, Cornelius and McAlear all featuring. Another Championship ex-player reunion.

Marinello and McAllister would be in mine, plus Wark, Russell and Cooper. Graham and Pettigrew too. Probably McCrae in goals. The others I will need to think about.