stuwell

I'd like to think he is already on that, his biggest weakness - and the reason Celtic let him go - is his build.

The other said something like 143/4 years with the 3 moving off the top and the 4 coming on from the bottom like a mile ometer changing from 3 to 4 - if that makes sense

Can't agree with this, the guy headed on for Moults first and then won a penalty for his forth two assists is a good return. He was wrong footed later in the game to miss what should be a sitter but not a bad game from him as far as I'm concerned.

Tough one today thought our midfield showed what they can do but with 4 goals Moult showed his worth.

I think that the club/society should look at extending the free kids season tickets scheme to allow non season ticket holders by some means. No sure how though

Can't disagree with this - no doubt others will though.

We are always hearing folk on here complaining that they either feel or are ignored by the club & society, so if this guy can get that perception changed and have fans feeling more involved then I think it's money well spent and I wish him well in his new job.

Thought there was a sell on clause and no doubt we have one also so best of luck to him and hope we get more from him in 18 months time

Why? Has Marv's agent got one booked on standby?

I always thought he was a decent RB but never a midfielder and would be happy to have him back as a RB.

If Celtic qualify for the CL and we get £250,000 at some point through the season, is it possible that the playing budget would be increased allowing MMcG to sign a further player or two or should it go on improving player facilities to make the club more attractive to sign for?

If we're going down that route then that's the passing game fucked.

".....skippy to run back to defend....." This is where ur plan falls down.

Having watched last weeks game on what I thought was a small pitch, if we play the same way we will struggle.

Is it a domestic cup now? It's not as if it's the league or Scottish cup.

If we get 95% of the "multi million deal" with a good sell on clause - I'm happy to let others have 5%

Well done to the boys.

It's not that I don't like 3 up front, more that I hate leaving no one up front when defending which in turn leaves no get out option - most clearances just come straight back again. Also hate that we appear to defend as wide as the 18 yard box and also concede the wings.

Not a good game to watch and if our tactics this season are to soak up the pressure and hit teams in the break then God help us.

Pis poor game but Caddens get it for his goal and assist.

Just try them all - that's my plan

Is that the teams you expect to put in bids for Him?

Maybe the wrong thread but I thought that here was a plan in place to repay the cash. If so then unless the board decide to pay it off quicker - and why should they since it's an interest free loan - I would expect any transfer fees to be used to help run the club this year and possibly next year. Whether that is day to day costs, player budgets or even further investments in players I'm not sure. We should also remember that the manager is expected to sell at least one player a season to help balance the books. Selling Marvin now could put us in a good position if someone comes looking at Moult later.

The hoop looks a bit high.

And the player - if the rumours are true - that Scott Leitch had by the throat for not trying in training when they played together.