Jump to content

2024/25 Ins & Outs Discussion


David
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, grizzlyg said:

McGinn has been one of our most consistent players so definitely should be kept.  Obika no way should be kept on and Butcher done us a great turn last season but shouldnt be offered a new deal.   I wouldn't mind SOD staying, has been much better this season and doesn't deserve the stick he gets from some

I agree with you pal. SOD has a very good communication with team as witnessed in the Dundee game when he came on, and carried out SK’s instructions.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given our defence is leakier than Downing Street, I'll focus my comments on those players now.

  • SOD will be 32 in May and should have a few years left in him, but probably not as a marauding RWB for much longer. He's local, so I'm sure he'd accept a new deal if offered, but it's anyone's guess what those terms would/should be.
  • McGinn will be 34 in October and probably has another season at least left at this level, so we may offer him a 1-year deal as he's versatile and reliable, and his experience will help the younger boys. However, I can see another SPL club offering him a 2-year contract with, likely, improved wages, which he would be wise to take. 
  • Bevis is a bit of an unknown. He's been here for what feels like a long time, and he's now an international captain, which is incredible for him. This new status will likely have his agent's ears pricked up, meaning he'll be getting touted for a higher wage to other clubs, although this could be something we accept and offer him a new deal anyway. 
  • Butcher appears to be finished at this level and shouldn't be offered a new deal. He's an Obika, unfortunately. 
  • Blaney is under contract, has found his way into the team lately, and may decide to see out his deal, but that all depends on what conversations Kettlewell has had with him. 
  • Casey. Let's hope he continues to improve and learn. His strengths and passion are there for all to see, as well as his weaknesses. He'll get a proper pre-season this year. 
  • Elliot. Does he exist? Why was he signed?
  • Gent's loan will end, and he's out of contract at Blackburn, meaning he's likely out of our price range, although I would love to sign him. He's been fantastic and seems to be flourishing. He can even play as an inside forward.
  • Monty is already back at Celtic, recovering from an injury, although we may see him come off the bench for us in May. Good luck to the lad, whatever happens, as his cameo was impressive. 
  • Devine. Back to Rangers. He would benefit from going out on loan to a lower league for a spell.
  • Wilson. He'll return to us from Beith, and his contract expires in May. I'm not sure what will happen next.
  • I've no clue about the other young lads and won't comment.
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, wellfan said:

Given our defence is leakier than Downing Street, I'll focus my comments on those players now.

  • SOD will be 32 in May and should have a few years left in him, but probably not as a marauding RWB for much longer. He's local, so I'm sure he'd accept a new deal if offered, but it's anyone's guess what those terms would/should be.
  • McGinn will be 34 in October and probably has another season at least left at this level, so we may offer him a 1-year deal as he's versatile and reliable, and his experience will help the younger boys. However, I can see another SPL club offering him a 2-year contract with, likely, improved wages, which he would be wise to take. 
  • Bevis is a bit of an unknown. He's been here for what feels like a long time, and he's now an international captain, which is incredible for him. This new status will likely have his agent's ears pricked up, meaning he'll be getting touted for a higher wage to other clubs, although this could be something we accept and offer him a new deal anyway. 
  • Butcher appears to be finished at this level and shouldn't be offered a new deal. He's an Obika, unfortunately. 
  • Blaney is under contract, has found his way into the team lately, and may decide to see out his deal, but that all depends on what conversations Kettlewell has had with him. 
  • Casey. Let's hope he continues to improve and learn. His strengths and passion are there for all to see, as well as his weaknesses. He'll get a proper pre-season this year. 
  • Elliot. Does he exist? Why was he signed?
  • Gent's loan will end, and he's out of contract at Blackburn, meaning he's likely out of our price range, although I would love to sign him. He's been fantastic and seems to be flourishing. He can even play as an inside forward.
  • Monty is already back at Celtic, recovering from an injury, although we may see him come off the bench for us in May. Good luck to the lad, whatever happens, as his cameo was impressive. 
  • Devine. Back to Rangers. He would benefit from going out on loan to a lower league for a spell.
  • Wilson. He'll return to us from Beith, and his contract expires in May. I'm not sure what will happen next.
  • I've no clue about the other young lads and won't comment.

Agree with pretty much all of that.

Whatever happens, there is plenty of scope for changes to our defence. 

First thing I would be doing is trying to identify a big commanding goalkeeper.

Hopefully SK can find the balance to the rest of the defence after that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wellfan said:

Devine. Back to Rangers. He would benefit from going out on loan to a lower league for a spell

He was previously on loan to Partick and latterly to Brechin in the Highland League where he only played 11 games. After that he went back to Rangers and played 4 games for their ‘B’ team before coming to us on loan.  No harm to the guy but having watched him since he arrived it’s hard to see him making his way in top level football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wellfan said:

Given our defence is leakier than Downing Street, I'll focus my comments on those players now.

  • SOD will be 32 in May and should have a few years left in him, but probably not as a marauding RWB for much longer. He's local, so I'm sure he'd accept a new deal if offered, but it's anyone's guess what those terms would/should be.
  • McGinn will be 34 in October and probably has another season at least left at this level, so we may offer him a 1-year deal as he's versatile and reliable, and his experience will help the younger boys. However, I can see another SPL club offering him a 2-year contract with, likely, improved wages, which he would be wise to take. 
  • Bevis is a bit of an unknown. He's been here for what feels like a long time, and he's now an international captain, which is incredible for him. This new status will likely have his agent's ears pricked up, meaning he'll be getting touted for a higher wage to other clubs, although this could be something we accept and offer him a new deal anyway. 
  • Butcher appears to be finished at this level and shouldn't be offered a new deal. He's an Obika, unfortunately. 
  • Blaney is under contract, has found his way into the team lately, and may decide to see out his deal, but that all depends on what conversations Kettlewell has had with him. 
  • Casey. Let's hope he continues to improve and learn. His strengths and passion are there for all to see, as well as his weaknesses. He'll get a proper pre-season this year. 
  • Elliot. Does he exist? Why was he signed?
  • Gent's loan will end, and he's out of contract at Blackburn, meaning he's likely out of our price range, although I would love to sign him. He's been fantastic and seems to be flourishing. He can even play as an inside forward.
  • Monty is already back at Celtic, recovering from an injury, although we may see him come off the bench for us in May. Good luck to the lad, whatever happens, as his cameo was impressive. 
  • Devine. Back to Rangers. He would benefit from going out on loan to a lower league for a spell.
  • Wilson. He'll return to us from Beith, and his contract expires in May. I'm not sure what will happen next.
  • I've no clue about the other young lads and won't comment.

From what I've read, Gent's contract appears to run till 2025. Completely agree, he's been great for us. If there's any realistic way of getting him back next season, we're surely looking at that, rather than spending money on one or two unknown quantities to replace him. He seems happy here and must realise he's well liked, which are good starting points, although a chance at Blackburn or bigger vultures swooping will obviously kill us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bobbybingo said:

From what I've read, Gent's contract appears to run till 2025. Completely agree, he's been great for us. If there's any realistic way of getting him back next season, we're surely looking at that, rather than spending money on one or two unknown quantities to replace him. He seems happy here and must realise he's well liked, which are good starting points, although a chance at Blackburn or bigger vultures swooping will obviously kill us.

For whatever reason, I thought he was out of contract, but it makes sense that he was sent to us after extending his deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully with the new investment coming in to the club we can maybe afford 1 or 2 better players for next season. If we sell Miller this summer we should be looking for upwards of the Turnbull fee as he's a great prospect. 

The squad needs a fair bit of surgery in my opinion.

Only players I'd be desperate to keep are Bair, Miller and Vale made permanent. Spittal would be here but off to Hearts. Would be surprised if they didn't all receive far more appealing financial offers.

Definetley need a overhaul in Defence and Midfield who knows maybe Kettlewell will even change formation. Either way hopefully we get into the top 6 and manage to sneak into 5th for a wee European tour next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, mfc said:

It looks like young dylan wells will be signing a new deal with us rather than going to the english premiership.

The ink is not dried yet. However, if it comes to pass, it would be a good bit of business and a  boost to our Academy. Probably best for the lad's long term development too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, mfc said:

It looks like young dylan wells will be signing a new deal with us rather than going to the english premiership.

That would be great.  I know money talks but he would be best staying with us for a few years and getting game time

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, grizzlyg said:

That would be great.  I know money talks but he would be best staying with us for a few years and getting game time

Exactly,if wells or any other youngster are good enough then the big move will eventually come,they will be much better off staying where they are and getting some real game time under the belt before moving on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better to stay, get games under your belt and move on as an Alan Campbell, David Turnbull or (whisper it) Chris Cadden, than a Jake Hastie or Bailey Rice........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joewarkfanclub said:

Better to stay, get games under your belt and move on as an Alan Campbell, David Turnbull or (whisper it) Chris Cadden, than a Jake Hastie or Bailey Rice........

Alan Martin, Reece McAlear.................

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, joewarkfanclub said:

Better to stay, get games under your belt and move on as an Alan Campbell, David Turnbull or (whisper it) Chris Cadden, than a Jake Hastie or Bailey Rice........

Although preferably leaving for a transfer fee as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mad Dog said:

Although preferably leaving for a transfer fee as well.

Of course!

You could add, not try and wind up our fans on your return to Fir Park having left for no transfer fee and bending international rules to ensure the development fee doesnt get paid!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joewarkfanclub said:

Of course!

You could add, not try and wind up our fans on your return to Fir Park having left for no transfer fee and bending international rules to ensure the development fee doesnt get paid!

It did get paid, though. Just took longer than usual because it was the first year MLS teams were in the scheme and their federation were trying to claim they were Tier 4 for the purposes of compensation pay outs. So it had to go through all the UEFA and FIFA bureaucracy until it was settled.

In the end, when Cadden signed for Hibs, the fee had to be paid before he got his clearance.

'Flow talked about this on a couple of occasions including confirming that it was paid.

Also, anybody who gives a footballer any credit for the brains to come up with a scheme like that hasn't met many footballers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Kmcalpin said:

The Rancid is reporting that SK is trying to fix up Georgie Gent and Jack Vale for next season. I hope he can pull that off ,but fear its a pipedream. .

Would have rather he got something in place before running to the press only alerts other clubs of their availability 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, weeyin said:

It did get paid, though. Just took longer than usual because it was the first year MLS teams were in the scheme and their federation were trying to claim they were Tier 4 for the purposes of compensation pay outs. So it had to go through all the UEFA and FIFA bureaucracy until it was settled.

In the end, when Cadden signed for Hibs, the fee had to be paid before he got his clearance.

'Flow talked about this on a couple of occasions including confirming that it was paid.

Also, anybody who gives a footballer any credit for the brains to come up with a scheme like that hasn't met many footballers.

 

Must have missed the fact that it was paid.

I do recall Flow talking about being in communication with the US club but there were complications because they were outside the regulatory framework.

Ive never thought Cadden cooked the scheme up. Always felt is was down to Columbus Crew and his agent. I hold no ill will towards the player but Id rather we didnt end up in the same situation again.

Anyway, my post was intended to be light hearted so maybe I should have used some imojis! 😆😆😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yodo said:

Would have rather he got something in place before running to the press only alerts other clubs of their availability 

Hes no that daft. There is a plan.🤞

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, joewarkfanclub said:

Must have missed the fact that it was paid.

I do recall Flow talking about being in communication with the US club but there were complications because they were outside the regulatory framework.

Ive never thought Cadden cooked the scheme up. Always felt is was down to Columbus Crew and his agent. I hold no ill will towards the player but Id rather we didnt end up in the same situation again.

Anyway, my post was intended to be light hearted so maybe I should have used some imojis! 😆😆😆

Just finish with a Ba boom.....and COYW!!   That is always my tactic !!!

Ba boom 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...