Jump to content

2026/27 Ins & Outs Discussion


David
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Happy Dosser said:

I've no idea really but he looked pretty cheesed off sitting in the POD and  the manager hasn't mentioned looking forward to his return, especially when the alternatives we have  aren't very inspiring. Hope I'm wrong and he'll be unleashed as our new secret weapon but it was just a feeling I had. He should certainly enjoy our increase in crosses into the box.

 

I would think he has every right to look pissed off if he was injured and then not up to speed for the teams first European game. Surely he would be in the squad if fit.

Lots of supossing going on here I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Richie said:

Jamie Knight-Lebel... Apparently 

If true would imagine its just a loan

Aye looks like he signed a new 3yr deal with Bristol in April.

Has 60 senior appearances under his belt though for Crewe and Swindon.

Certainly fits our demographic apart from the loan bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to see Jamie coming in, looks a good addition but tbh I’m disappointed that we appear to be going down the loan route, destroys our operating model a bit.

Thats our goalkeeper n new CH on loan, I’d have thought we would have been looking for those unearthed gems.

Hoping to see a new attacking midfielder n a striker or two being rolled out very soon, perhaps Mas staying with us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Motherwell Daft said:

Good to see Jamie coming in, looks a good addition but tbh I’m disappointed that we appear to be going down the loan route, destroys our operating model a bit.

Thats our goalkeeper n new CH on loan, I’d have thought we would have been looking for those unearthed gems.

Hoping to see a new attacking midfielder n a striker or two being rolled out very soon, perhaps Mas staying with us?

I think the injuries will be a reason we have got a few loanees in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, grizzlyg said:

I think the injuries will be a reason we have got a few loanees in.  

Good point.

With a fit McGinn, SOD, Koutroumbis & McGhee, we probably dont really need another CB. But right now with all 4 injured, we definitely do.

Hopefully we can get another midfielder and a striker in soon.....

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve said here before that loans should be the exception rather than the rule. The injuries might be forcing us down that road at the moment, but I do worry we’re starting to head down the Kettlewell route. Injuries aside, we’ve got the finances and the model to sign permanent players for the key roles we need. Loans should supplement that, not become the solution.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, wellfan said:

I’ve said here before that loans should be the exception rather than the rule. The injuries might be forcing us down that road at the moment, but I do worry we’re starting to head down the Kettlewell route. Injuries aside, we’ve got the finances and the model to sign permanent players for the key roles we need. Loans should supplement that, not become the solution.

I wonder if they've decided to squirrel as much money away as possible to put it towards these infrastructure jobs that we've been discussing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wellfan said:

I’ve said here before that loans should be the exception rather than the rule. The injuries might be forcing us down that road at the moment, but I do worry we’re starting to head down the Kettlewell route. Injuries aside, we’ve got the finances and the model to sign permanent players for the key roles we need. Loans should supplement that, not become the solution.

To be honest I don't think we will be going down that line again. We are just in situation just now due to various factors.

1. 6 players plus Welsh all left

2. 8 players out injured 

3. Season started earlier due to European ties.

We needed a keeper in quick so that explains Paulsen deal.  Lowry one i can see being loan but with view to permanent move if he takes advantage of this opportunity for him.

Hopefully a couple more permanent signings and injured players back will mean 3 max on loan

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wellfan said:

I’ve said here before that loans should be the exception rather than the rule. The injuries might be forcing us down that road at the moment, but I do worry we’re starting to head down the Kettlewell route. Injuries aside, we’ve got the finances and the model to sign permanent players for the key roles we need. Loans should supplement that, not become the solution.

I'm with you on that. Loans do have their place, providing they're not overdone. We've now acquired 2 loan signings, maybe to cover short term injuries but I don't get the Paulsen one. We knew a wee bit in advance that Ward was likely to move on and so would likely have time to prepare. One more to cover a striker perhaps given the number of injuries/permacrocks in that department. Less so in defence and certainly not in midfield.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We brought in 3 loanees last season. 2 of them didn't work out (Sule and Osong) and one did (Welsh).

If that model plus the players we signed on permanent deals managed to bring us success, there's not much need to deviate too far this season.

As others have said, we have some unexpected injury problems to deal with too, and loans can be a good way to fill the gaps - directly or indirectly - if the expectation is that the injured players will return in the first half of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the loans work then brilliant but as folk have said it affects our model of selling players.  Am hopeful that the loans are to assist with the injuries and possibly give some reassurance to the manager re size of the squad at this early stage but also maybe more confidence in playing the youngsters.  Won’t know if these loanees are good though till they play. Hopefully adds to the quality without us having to pay wages etc beyond our means. If we do have 9 million I would hope that we are at least investing 2 million back in player signings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, grizzlyg said:

To be honest I don't think we will be going down that line again. We are just in situation just now due to various factors.

1. 6 players plus Welsh all left

2. 8 players out injured 

3. Season started earlier due to European ties.

We needed a keeper in quick so that explains Paulsen deal.  Lowry one i can see being loan but with view to permanent move if he takes advantage of this opportunity for him.

Hopefully a couple more permanent signings and injured players back will mean 3 max on loan

A sensible post , no panic , no puns , no old jokes and no crap jokes things are looking up . 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...