That Old Chestnut - Do We Move Or Do We Stay

[weeyin]

Timing is certainly key. Relatively speaking the Fir Park site was probably worth more 25 years ago too.

I'd love it if we could find a way to finance new facilities, but Falkirk is a great example of the challenges to fund that and be able to build a complete stadium. 

 

[joewarkfanclub]

13 minutes ago, weeyin said:

Timing is certainly key. Relatively speaking the Fir Park site was probably worth more 25 years ago too.

I'd love it if we could find a way to finance new facilities, but Falkirk is a great example of the challenges to fund that and be able to build a complete stadium. 

 

Not to mention to stay competitive enough to stay in the top flight....

[weeyin]

55 minutes ago, joewarkfanclub said:

Not to mention to stay competitive enough to stay in the top flight....

And if we sold Fir Park we'd likely need a temporary home to play in while a new stadium was being built as it's unlikely any buyer is going to wait a few years. 

[dennyc]

10 hours ago, weeyin said:

It's not about the location, although transport etc. is important. It's about the quality of the new facilities.

Do we want what Falkirk, St Mirren or St Johnstone have? Even that would be a stretch financially, but I find it pretty uninspiring - probably the opposite of a Luddite, as I'd want something more modern. 

 

I went to the Falkirk Dundee Utd game and was impressed with what I saw in the main stand. An excellent view, spacious seats, well under cover and catering facilities that put Fir Park to shame. Think a smaller version of the Hampden set up but still with several kiosks and a Club shop. Easily accessible and no lengthy queues blocking off toilet access. Talking of which, numerous toilets, wide corridors and staircases. So no crushing at full time despite a full house. 
Hospitality on an upper tier but not infringing on us peasants. Stacks of pre bookable car parking for home and away fans. A good income generator I imagine. Did take a wee while to exit the car park though but nowhere near as frustrating as at Perth. 

Cannot comment on what the away stand offers fans as I was on holiday when we last played there. 

As a POD season ticket holder, the set up I saw at Falkirk was far superior to the facilities on offer at Fir Park. Both the POD and Hunter Stands need a massive upgrade and whether that is possible given space limitations and likely disruption I have my doubts. If it can be done, fair enough. Let’s see what the study reveals. 

Where Falkirk do fall down is in having stands on three sides only which does feel weird. Even worse than Accies in my opinion.   Why they have no stand on one side I have no idea. But other than that  I would happily move to such a Stadium. As you suggest, the quality of any new facility would have to be up to scratch but done correctly it would be fine. A site where neighbouring housing did not impact the construction of the stands would be a huge leap forward. 

[Big Stall]

Easy solution...... qualify for & have a good run in the champions league & we can finance a fair bit of whats being talked about ........ 🤣🤣

[Kmcalpin]

10 hours ago, weeyin said:

I'd love it if we could find a way to finance new facilities, but Falkirk is a great example of the challenges to fund that and be able to build a complete stadium. 

Easy. Just plough most of the cash into the team; neglect the stadium; and get someone else to substantially pay for a new one.   

[FirParkCornerExile]

10 hours ago, dennyc said:

I went to the Falkirk Dundee Utd game and was impressed with what I saw in the main stand. An excellent view, spacious seats, well under cover and catering facilities that put Fir Park to shame. Think a smaller version of the Hampden set up but still with several kiosks and a Club shop. Easily accessible and no lengthy queues blocking off toilet access. Talking of which, numerous toilets, wide corridors and staircases. So no crushing at full time despite a full house. 
Hospitality on an upper tier but not infringing on us peasants. Stacks of pre bookable car parking for home and away fans. A good income generator I imagine. Did take a wee while to exit the car park though but nowhere near as frustrating as at Perth. 

Cannot comment on what the away stand offers fans as I was on holiday when we last played there. 

As a POD season ticket holder, the set up I saw at Falkirk was far superior to the facilities on offer at Fir Park. Both the POD and Hunter Stands need a massive upgrade and whether that is possible given space limitations and likely disruption I have my doubts. If it can be done, fair enough. Let’s see what the study reveals. 

Where Falkirk do fall down is in having stands on three sides only which does feel weird. Even worse than Accies in my opinion.   Why they have no stand on one side I have no idea. But other than that  I would happily move to such a Stadium. As you suggest, the quality of any new facility would have to be up to scratch but done correctly it would be fine. A site where neighbouring housing did not impact the construction of the stands would be a huge leap forward. 

of the new builds , for smaller clubs in Scotland, Falkirks is probably the best but with the obvious down side of only three stands and open corners but the viewing positions are excellent.

[dennyc]

12 minutes ago, FirParkCornerExile said:

of the new builds , for smaller clubs in Scotland, Falkirks is probably the best but with the obvious down side of only three stands and open corners but the viewing positions are excellent.

I was pleasantly surprised. I kind of expected a heartless, concrete ground but not so. Still areas for improvement but a better experience than at other comparable new builds. Finance clearly defines what we could achieve but it will be interesting to learn how much a proper refitting of Fir Park would cost in comparison to a new build. Especially if the Local Authority was able to provide the land at no cost to MFC. Folk living in the area will know far better than me whether there is council land lying vacant which could be utilised. MFC are an asset the Authority should be proud of and willing to support.

I do understand that many fans have a sentimental outlook where Fir Park and our history is concerned.  I respect that view. But that approach by previous Boards has contributed to the situation we now find ourselves in. And to the increased cost of now finding a sustainable solution. 

[FirParkCornerExile]

17 minutes ago, dennyc said:

I was pleasantly surprised. I kind of expected a heartless, concrete ground but not so. Still areas for improvement but a better experience than at other comparable new builds. Finance clearly defines what we could achieve but it will be interesting to learn how much a proper refitting of Fir Park would cost in comparison to a new build. Especially if the Local Authority was able to provide the land at no cost to MFC. Folk living in the area will know far better than me whether there is council land lying vacant which could be utilised. MFC are an asset the Authority should be proud of and willing to support.

I do understand that many fans have a sentimental outlook where Fir Park and our history is concerned.  I respect that view. But that approach by previous Boards has contributed to the situation we now find ourselves in. And to the increased cost of now finding a sustainable solution. 

I agree Fir Park is a money pit and anything that lessens the money we have to pay for ground maintenance is welcome , as is the chance to have very good corporate facilities and avenues for raising more money 7 days a week, something for which Fir Park seems limited. 

[weeyin]

2 hours ago, Kmcalpin said:

Easy. Just plough most of the cash into the team; neglect the stadium; and get someone else to substantially pay for a new one.   

I wonder if that will be one of the proposals from the feasibility study!

[Clackscat]

26 minutes ago, dennyc said:

I was pleasantly surprised. I kind of expected a heartless, concrete ground but not so. Still areas for improvement but a better experience than at other comparable new builds. Finance clearly defines what we could achieve but it will be interesting to learn how much a proper refitting of Fir Park would cost in comparison to a new build. Especially if the Local Authority was able to provide the land at no cost to MFC. Folk living in the area will know far better than me whether there is council land lying vacant which could be utilised. MFC are an asset the Authority should be proud of and willing to support.

I do understand that many fans have a sentimental outlook where Fir Park and our history is concerned.  I respect that view. But that approach by previous Boards has contributed to the situation we now find ourselves in. And to the increased cost of now finding a sustainable solution. 

The other thing to say about Falkirk is that the main stand is utilised daily, renting out offices and space to businesses on a daily or longer basis etc, so it also generates non match day revenue

[joewarkfanclub]

I wouldnt say Im not sentimentally attached to Fir Park as Ive been going there for over  50 years and will undoubtedly be a wrench if and when we have to leave.

However, Im also a pragmatist, so while it would he nice to have the finances to remain and modernise what we have on the existing site, Im also open to moving to a new site, and not necessarily Ravenscraig, although it is the obvious alternative and has the emotional attachment to the club by virtue of it being the site of the steelworks.

The deciding factor for me will always be the long term security of the club.

Which option best serves that best whilst allowing us to remain competitive on the pitch?

I guess the answer to that will be in the feasibility study.

Hopefully we will get the boards view in due course.....

[Spiderpig]

1 hour ago, Clackscat said:

The other thing to say about Falkirk is that the main stand is utilised daily, renting out offices and space to businesses on a daily or longer basis etc, so it also generates non match day revenue

Falkirk dont own the main stand its leased long term. They only own the other two stands, so i presume any non match day revenue goes to whatever organisation actually owns the stand, i think it was the local council at one point.