2026/27 Ins & Outs Discussion

[David]

25 minutes ago, purestate said:

I’d be happy to try unilaterally to have a squad with a lot of (Scots) youngsters getting a chance. 

That's exactly my thinking, which is why I'm not so quick to dismiss some of the players we have in and around the first team already. I do think we have set a very high bar as fans, where we're looking for Turnbull/Miller/Johnston levels otherwise we shouldn't be looking to retain them.

We're going to have fringe players. It's how it works for clubs our size who require a decent-sized squad of players. I'd rather those fringe players were our own youngsters than loans or free signings that aren't all that much better in reality.

[wellsince75]

I’m sure most fans would love to see more their own coming through and to be fair there’s a virtuous cycle re playing and promoting youngsters that will encourage better quality youngsters over time. 

There’s a balance to be found . I’m  up for youngsters going on loan which several have done . There’s an argument they’ll get ready faster for first team by doing this . The reverse must also be true where we get bigger clubs youngsters .

Not all youngsters will be good enough - not just for the first team but also the squad . If we’ve had a player who’s been with us for several years , been out on loan and still lacking I don’t really accept that because they’re young and Scottish that we should keep them in the squad . 
 

fwiw I personally think the club are doing a very decent job at getting the balance right .

 

[dennyc]

2 hours ago, David said:

 

Not every player needs to be someone we're priming to sell on for millions. Sometimes it's fine to have a Euan Wilson-type player who can plug gaps and fill in as and when needed.

This idea that if someone hits 21 and hasn't become Lennon Miller means they're not up to doing a job is crazy. 

I agree to a degree but to my way of thinking you look at each position, starter and back up, and look to upgrade where possible. From youth teams (ours and elsewhere) if possible for those back ups.. That way you achieve a constant uplift in quality on the pitch and on the bench.. And more likliehood that those bench players will elevate to first team regulars.

Regards Wilson, he has been with us for a good number of years and after a very promising start has shown little to no progress. Despite loan placements to address whatever deficiencies our coaches identified. So how long do we wait before looking to upgrade? Ditto Luca Ross I guess. And if we hold on too long, are we effectively missing out on others that might improve us?

Not saying it's easy or that some decisions are painful to make but eventually it will be to the benefit of all concerned to part ways.

Cue Wilson scoring the winner on Thursday.

 

[purestate]

16 minutes ago, dennyc said:

So how long do we wait before looking to upgrade? Ditto Luca Ross I guess. And if we hold on too long, are we effectively missing out on others that might improve us?

Yes. This is the dilemma.  
On these specific players I do think Wilson has shown enough to be the type of squad player we are talking about.  In this case we have both Williams and Longelo who would likely start at left back in almost every case but he could replace either if not available.  
Ross hasn’t, for me, shown / grasped his chance in any position.  Maybe he is an example of going out to lower league as last opportunity.  

Long may we have some coming through to have these debates. 

 

[weeyin]

1 hour ago, texanwellfan said:

I thought I read someone on here saying it was in competition rules but not sure if it was specific competition or all competitions

We need 8 in our squad of 25 for the Conference League.

[FirParkCornerExile]

Anyone think we are likely to keep Maswanhise this season as interest appears to have tailed off.

[stv]

8 minutes ago, FirParkCornerExile said:

Anyone think we are likely to keep Maswanhise this season as interest appears to have tailed off.

Probably keep him, he has lost form badly, falling over with his hands in the air too often just get on with it . Give him that he really shouldn't be up front in the middle himself tho.

[Kmcalpin]

1 hour ago, purestate said:

Ross hasn’t, for me, shown / grasped his chance in any position.  Maybe he is an example of going out to lower league as last opportunity.  

Sadly I have to agree. I've seen nothing to convince me he's got what it takes at our level. Against HB he looked lightweight and the game passed him by. There will now be other young lads knocking on the door.  

[johnstone]

3 hours ago, smiddy said:

Who was the other goalie warming up with connolly on sat ? Any idea ?

It’s the youth GK 

[Mad Dog]

29 minutes ago, johnstone said:

It’s the youth GK 

Jack McConnell, 18 year-old from Wishaw.

[David]

15 hours ago, dennyc said:

I agree to a degree but to my way of thinking you look at each position, starter and back up, and look to upgrade where possible. From youth teams (ours and elsewhere) if possible for those back ups.. That way you achieve a constant uplift in quality on the pitch and on the bench.. And more likliehood that those bench players will elevate to first team regulars.

Regards Wilson, he has been with us for a good number of years and after a very promising start has shown little to no progress. Despite loan placements to address whatever deficiencies our coaches identified. So how long do we wait before looking to upgrade? Ditto Luca Ross I guess. And if we hold on too long, are we effectively missing out on others that might improve us?

Not saying it's easy or that some decisions are painful to make but eventually it will be to the benefit of all concerned to part ways.

Cue Wilson scoring the winner on Thursday.

Look, I'm not saying Wilson is anything special. But he's 21 years old, he's closing in on 50 games for us altogether, and he's played over 100 career games in Scottish football. 

By my count, we have a decent number of defenders on the books, and throughout the season we'll see varying levels of availability depending on injury and suspension, so someone like Wilson could be useful to plug those gaps while also seemingly willing to not play for longer spells when availability is higher.

If we decide tomorrow that he's not progressed enough and we want to move on, who fills that gap? Do we pay money for a player to come in and fill that role? Or, more likely, do we find some random from down south with very similar attributes to Wilson to fill the gap on loan?

My guess is that the likes of JGR, JKL, Moormann and Williams aren't on buttons salary-wise, so having someone like Wilson as a somewhat versatile squad player, most likely on budget-friendly wages, isn't the worst thing in the world. 

My choice on when we'd upgrade from him is when another youngster comes through in that position, and we can then plug them in and see if their potential ceiling is higher. Is there someone in the youth setup who fits that criteria that could replace Wilson? If so, get them up and let's see how they do. 

Until then, I'd rather we kept Wilson than potentially find ourselves short if the injuries pile up, or go down the route of a loan who comes in and does absolutely nothing. 

On Luca Ross, I see from socials that he's just turned 20 years old. Are we deciding players are no good before they hit 20 years old now? 

As a comparison, Maswanhise had not played a single game as a senior pro by that age. Paul McGinn was heading into his first full season for Queens Park in the third division. 

Again, not saying either will become superstars, but we're getting awfully quick to want to pull the trigger on these kids these days.