Slattery

[texanwellfan]

So will every player who gets booked for Simulation get the same 4 game ban?

they should!!!  
 

[texanwellfan]

What statement did the SFA issue with the ban? 

[Spiderpig]

9 minutes ago, texanwellfan said:

So will every player who gets booked for Simulation get the same 4 game ban?

they should!!!  
 

They wont though, its the SFA we are talking about here.

[bobbybingo]

23 minutes ago, Spiderpig said:

If var had done its job properly, the St mirren player would never been sent off, Slattery would have had a yellow card and that would have been the end of it.

But they made a James Hunt of it and Slattery gets a 2 game ban instead of a yellow card, it really is a feckin shambles of an organisation, can you imagine the shit storm if it had been one of ghe ugly sisters players getting banned.

The clubs really need to grow a set and start challenging the whole set up, as its not fit for purpose.

The incompetence displayed by officials in general is off the charts. VAR has just given them another opportunity to display how clueless they are, and it can't be described as teething trouble, since decisions are getting worse with every passing week. If that lot can't play with their toys properly, they shouldn't be allowed any.

[Kmcalpin]

Does anyone know who was on the disciplinary panel?

[bobbybingo]

39 minutes ago, texanwellfan said:

What statement did the SFA issue with the ban? 

Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached: Disciplinary Rule 77. A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall, at all times, act in the best interests of Association Football. Furthermore such person or body shall not act in any manner which is improper or use any one (1), or a combination of, violent Conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour.

Hearing date: Thursday, 26 March 2026

Outcome: Proved

[Ya Bezzer!]

1 hour ago, Spiderpig said:

If var had done its job properly, the St mirren player would never been sent off, Slattery would have had a yellow card and that would have been the end of it.

But they made a James Hunt of it and Slattery gets a 2 game ban instead of a yellow card, it really is a feckin shambles of an organisation, can you imagine the shit storm if it had been one of ghe ugly sisters players getting banned.

The clubs really need to grow a set and start challenging the whole set up, as its not fit for purpose.

Deliberately feigning injury to get a player sent off should be a red card offence.

Referees might be incompetent and VAR might be a shambles but I doubt they are actively cheating like Slattery was.

Trying to twist the incident so that the SFA is at fault is ridiculous.

Our player cheated, got caught and is now being rightly punished.

Let it be a lesson to others, Motherwell players or otherwise that that kind of blatant cheating is totally unacceptable.

And BTW the sort of pathetic paranoia that 'it wouldn't happen to this team or that team ' is exactly the same justification the Old Firm use all the time.

Take some ownership.

 

 

[Orinoco]

Will Clancey and co be suspended for their cheating re Chamberlains red card offence on Just? Its on the audio!

Will Chamberlain be cited for a dangerous tackle? or is falling over to highlight an assualt attempt worse than injurying an opponent?

What about simulation to win penalties? 

At the time it could not be proved the saints player connected but now we are to believe he did not. 

Another example of over zealous authorities with a new agenda.

Irrespective of the rights and wrongs they have made up a punishment and hammered the small guys. No chance they do this to Celtic or Rangers.  

Going forward, Con the authorities and be hammered but the officials now need to be held accountable for their lack of professionalism and constant, apparently honest,  mistakes. 

The whole thing stinks. At this point of the season a quiet word in his ear and notice they would clamp down on it next season would have sufficed.

Another point. The saints player being sent off did not hinder them. They were already beat and successfully appealed the decision prior to next game. 

Players con officials at every turn. Where do they draw the line?

[numpty]

1 hour ago, texanwellfan said:

this has never been done before. Where the fknin the rules and regulations does it allow them to review this and asking a four game ban for a yellow card offence.  

Rule 201. The SFA introduced it in 2011, and have handed out a few two game bans for it since then. The additional two suspended is new, though.

[Kmcalpin]

45 minutes ago, Ya Bezzer! said:

Deliberately feigning injury to get a player sent off should be a red card offence.

So, how is a referee to know why a player dives or feigns injury? Should that apply to every over reaction that could lead to the "offender" being carded? Could Slattery have said "I only ever meant to get him yellow carded".  As I said, this has opened a can of worms. 

[wellsince75]

I despise diving/feigning injury .  Something we'd do well to get rid of, together with VAR. 

Dishing on strong punishment like this as many have said is welcomed.  That being said there's a way to do it and that's being clear with all clubs that moving forward players will dealt with in xyz manner.  Typically this happens at the start of a season. 

It's zero surprise that it's non OF clubs that first feel the wrath. To do it retrospectively like this with such a severe punishment should be baffling but sadly just another piece of evidence of how badly the game is being run. 

[joewarkfanclub]

1 hour ago, Ya Bezzer! said:

Deliberately feigning injury to get a player sent off should be a red card offence.

Referees might be incompetent and VAR might be a shambles but I doubt they are actively cheating like Slattery was.

Trying to twist the incident so that the SFA is at fault is ridiculous.

Our player cheated, got caught and is now being rightly punished.

Let it be a lesson to others, Motherwell players or otherwise that that kind of blatant cheating is totally unacceptable.

And BTW the sort of pathetic paranoia that 'it wouldn't happen to this team or that team ' is exactly the same justification the Old Firm use all the time.

Take some ownership.

 

 

Bit of a strange take.

You say it "should be a red card offence", I agree, only it isnt at the moment.

As someone, who openly criticised Slattery at the time and was embarassed by his actions, I have no issue with him being retrospectively punished.

But the punishment has to fit the crime, and shouldnt just be made up on the hoof to make an example out of someone retrospectively.

If that had happened no one would really argue, but this seems unfair and OTT, so no surprise some of our fans are leaping to the defence of our player.

[bobbybingo]

54 minutes ago, numpty said:

Rule 201. The SFA introduced it in 2011, and have handed out a few two game bans for it since then. The additional two suspended is new, though.

This wasn't a breach of Rule 201, though, according to the SFA.

[texanwellfan]

1 hour ago, Ya Bezzer! said:

Deliberately feigning injury to get a player sent off should be a red card offence.

Referees might be incompetent and VAR might be a shambles but I doubt they are actively cheating like Slattery was.

Trying to twist the incident so that the SFA is at fault is ridiculous.

Our player cheated, got caught and is now being rightly punished.

Let it be a lesson to others, Motherwell players or otherwise that that kind of blatant cheating is totally unacceptable.

And BTW the sort of pathetic paranoia that 'it wouldn't happen to this team or that team ' is exactly the same justification the Old Firm use all the time.

Take some ownership.

 

 

Slattery has no control over sending him off. Yes, it was embarrassing and as someone else noted, he should have had a yellow for simulation. It was the incompetent officiating team that decided to send the player off. 

[Mad Dog]

The only sensible thing about this is the two games suspended. Have that in the back of a player's mind and they'll think twice about cheating.

[dennyc]

25 minutes ago, joewarkfanclub said:

Bit of a strange take.

You say it "should be a red card offence", I agree, only it isnt at the moment.

As someone, who openly criticised Slattery at the time and was embarassed by his actions, I have no issue with him being retrospectively punished.

But the punishment has to fit the crime, and shouldnt just be made up on the hoof to make an example out of someone retrospectively.

If that had happened no one would really argue, but this seems unfair and OTT, so no surprise some of our fans are leaping to the defence of our player.

It has not been made up on the hoof. Walker of Hearts and Shalke of Ross County both received two match bans for cheating. Ironically one of the games Shalke sat out was against us. No mention before of suspended bans though so that is new.

For the conspiracy theorists, both those bans were after restospective charges were brought following games against Celtic. Meekins of Inverness did have such a ban overturned on appeal. He was also cited after a match v Celtic. He would have missed a Cup Final had the decision been upheld. After the Compliance Officer was accused of having links to Celtic such citations suddenly stopped. Until now it seems. Again. all before VAR was introduced to assist referees who got it wrong on first viewing.